The Hypocrisy Of The Self-Righteousness Woke Movement
Hello, dear readers, and welcome to a conversation that delves into the depths of the Woke movement.
In a world filled with complex issues and evolving ideologies, it’s essential to explore what it means to be “Woke” and understand whether or not it embodies compassion and a desire to help the world.
To save you from reading the full article, it doesn’t. You can just buy The Shankara Oracle and use it to turn your mind’s illusions into deep, resounding clarity.
Onward!
If I Tweet, I’m Woke
Navigating the labyrinthine world of the woke and hashtag movement often feels like attending a masquerade ball, where everyone is wearing a mask of virtue but can’t resist peeking under their neighbor’s mask to ensure theirs is shinier. It’s a comedic spectacle of ‘do as I tweet, not as I do,’ where the race to out-woke each other turns into a parody worthy of its own sitcom.
Picture this: a flurry of hashtags battling it out in the digital arena, each proclaiming its allegiance to the latest cause, yet the moment the screens go dark, so does the commitment.
It’s as if the movement has confused activism with hashtag-ism, mistaking the posting of a witty, socially charged tweet for the entirety of social change. The irony hits its peak when the very crusaders for equality and justice are found in the VIP section of the moral high ground, sipping on the cocktail of hypocrisy, all while tweeting about the perils of privilege.
In this world, the keyboard is mightier than the sword, but only until the next trending topic comes along, leaving behind a trail of abandoned hashtags and half-hearted revolutions, all in a day’s work.
Lazy Wokers
The modern discourse swirling around the self-righteousness of the woke movement has crossed the border into phenomenal hypocrisy – all cloaked in the guise of moral superiority and enlightenment.
This movement, which ostensibly champions inclusivity, equity, and social justice, paradoxically finds itself mired in a quagmire of exclusivity and intolerance for dissenting viewpoints.
It’s a curious spectacle where the crusade for open-mindedness frequently shuts the door on the rich tapestry of human thought, preferring a monochrome narrative over a kaleidoscopic diversity of perspectives. It’s as if the movement, in its zealous march towards utopian inclusivity, inadvertently champions a new form of exclusivity that brooks no challenge to its preconceived notions of morality and justice.
Yet, within this earnest endeavor lies a playful irony; the very champions of tolerance become intolerant of opposition, embodying the hypocrisy they claim to fight against. It’s a theater of the absurd where dialogues turn into monologues, and the stage is set not for a debate but a sermon. The movement, in its pursuit of rectitude, often indulges in the very vices it seeks to eradicate, dressing them up in the finery of social justice lingo, making them palatable to the masses.
This comedy of errors reveals a truth often ignored: the path to genuine understanding and inclusivity is paved not with righteous indignation but with humility and a willingness to engage with the world in all its messy complexity.
This isn’t to dismiss the underlying intentions of the woke movement, which, at its heart, seeks to address and rectify long-standing injustices. However, the movement’s potency is diluted by its occasional descent into the dogmatism it seeks to dismantle.
In the end, the greatest irony of all may be that the movement’s most formidable obstacle to achieving its lofty ideals isn’t external resistance but its internal contradictions. As the movement navigates these tumultuous waters, it stands at a crossroads, facing a choice between continuing down a path of exclusionary self-righteousness or embracing a more inclusive, self-reflective approach that truly embodies the ideals it espouses. Only time will tell which path will be chosen, but the journey itself promises to be as instructive as it is imperative.
Ah, When I Was Young-ish
Years back, a spiritual aspirant was responsible for being vocal, active, and engaged in political discourse. If there was a peace march, we were responsible for showing up and participating with passion.
People brought food and drink, and it was fun. It was also effective. We spent less time blaming and more time educating and enrolling members of the opposition in discussions – which were also fun!
Over time, as we’ve become lazier and more addicted to our opinions of narcissists and endless scrolling, political dissenters are no longer engaged with intelligence and passion. Now, they’re influencers looking for attention rather than change.
They’ve checked-out, focusing more on complaining, pointing the finger, and actively hating anyone who does not agree with them. Their obsession is less with improving the situation and more with being part of a movement to edify their egos and sell branded dildos that can also be used to stir pasta.
Sadly, these whiney, needy weenies are no better and far less effective than the right-wing bigots who hate everybody. Somehow, ignorance has crossed the aisle.
Little change or value comes from the Woke movement. It’s now just a cliche, refusing to be an active and impassioned vehicle to inspire positive change in the world.
The Essence of Being Woke
Being “Woke” has gained prominence as a term describing an awakening to social and political injustices. It’s about recognizing systemic problems, questioning the status quo, and advocating for change. At its core, it carries the noble intention of making the world a better place.
The Pitfall of Self-Righteousness
In the passionate pursuit of justice and equity, too many individuals unintentionally veer toward Self-righteousness. They might adopt an attitude that they alone hold the moral high ground, that their perspective is infallible, and that anyone who disagrees is morally deficient. This attitude can hinder productive dialogue and true progress.
While both sides are guilty of this, it’s the Wokers who claim compassion as their badge but too often fail to activate it.
True compassion is the essence of any meaningful social change. It requires us to empathize with the suffering of others, regardless of their viewpoints or backgrounds – and whether or not the other side is embodying compassion.
It’s about fostering connections, finding common ground, and working together to create positive change. Sometimes, you have to let the other side win for a while so they can get a good look at themselves. This can take time.
Truly, it’s nearly impossible to force someone to change their opinions, intentions, beliefs, and actions. Leaving this idea out of the equation leaves us short-sighted, discouraged, angry, and unsuccessful.
Even corporate non-allyship has turned into a circus where someone will cancel a brand or comedian, then buy from worse brands and quote the jokes of even more outrageous comedians. People are so fucked up and inconsistent – especially the Woke movement.
Understanding the Human Condition
To transcend Self-righteousness, it’s essential to recognize the complexities of the human condition. We all have our biases, blind spots, and limitations. Only enlightened masters possess the ultimate truth or solution to every problem. The recognition of our shared humanity can help us approach social issues with humility rather than Self-righteousness.
Engaging in meaningful dialogue is a powerful tool for change. Rather than imposing our beliefs on others, we should be open to hearing diverse perspectives. This doesn’t mean compromising on our values but acknowledging that constructive dialogue can lead to more profound understanding and potential solutions.
Empathy is the cornerstone of compassion. It enables us to see the world through others’ eyes and understand their experiences. When we approach social issues with empathy, we are more likely to build bridges rather than walls.
It’s important to recognize that Self-righteousness often stems from a deep desire for justice. By redirecting this energy toward positive actions, we can transform self-righteousness into a force for empowerment. Instead of condemning others, let’s focus on educating, raising awareness, and actively working toward change.
Embracing the True Essence of Being Woke
In our quest to be Woke and advocate for a better world, let us not forget the fundamental value of compassion. Compassion bridges divides, fosters understanding, and empowers us to create meaningful change. Being Woke is not about self-righteousness, but about a commitment to justice, empathy, and the belief that we can work together to make our world a more equitable and harmonious place.
With open hearts and a spirit of unity, let us navigate the path of compassion on our journey toward positive social transformation.
Wokers Prefer Complaining Over Service
Some people who claim to be “Woke” are primarily complaining without taking tangible action to solve or heal the problem.
Some individuals may not have a clear understanding of what being “woke” truly entails or what specific actions are required to address the issues they are concerned about. As a result, they may engage in complaints or critiques without knowing how to effectively contribute to change.
Many social and political issues are complex and deeply rooted. People may feel overwhelmed by the magnitude of these challenges, leading to frustration and a sense of helplessness. This can manifest as complaining or venting rather than constructive action.
Social media platforms often provide a space for people to express their opinions and frustrations quickly and easily. Unfortunately, this can sometimes result in a focus on performative activism, where individuals share opinions or complaints online without taking substantial real-world action.
Some people may genuinely believe that sharing information or venting about issues is a form of activism or contribution. They may not be aware of the need for concrete actions, such as volunteering, donating, or engaging in community organizing.
Engaging in activism can be intimidating, especially when individuals fear backlash or personal consequences. Some may opt for safer forms of expression, such as complaining, to avoid potential risks associated with more active involvement.
Advocating for social change can be emotionally draining. People who have been deeply involved in activism may experience burnout, leading to periods of frustration or venting rather than sustained action.
It’s important to remember that not everyone who claims to be “woke” fits this description, and many individuals are actively working towards positive change in their communities and society at large. Constructive dialogue, education, and engagement are essential components of meaningful activism. Encouraging individuals to move beyond complaining and take concrete steps toward positive change can be a valuable approach.
The Damaging Effects Of Cancel Culture
Cancel culture, which involves the public shaming, boycotting, or ostracizing of individuals or entities for perceived offensive actions or beliefs, has garnered significant attention and debate in recent years.
While it is often driven by a desire for accountability and social justice, cancel culture can have several damaging effects, including:
Suppression of Free Speech: Cancel culture can stifle open and honest dialogue by creating a climate of fear in which individuals may Self-censor to avoid backlash. This undermines the principles of free speech and open debate, which are essential in a democratic society.
Lack of Due Process: Cancel culture often operates without a formal process or due diligence, leading to potential miscarriages of justice. People may be “canceled” based on incomplete or inaccurate information, without an opportunity to defend themselves or address the allegations.
Fear of Innovation and Creativity: Cancel culture can discourage innovation and creativity in art, entertainment, and intellectual and academic fields. Fear of backlash may lead creators to produce content that is safe and unchallenging, stifling artistic expression.
Mental Health Impact: Individuals who experience cancel culture can suffer from severe emotional distress, anxiety, depression, and even trauma. Public shaming and online harassment can have lasting effects on mental well-being. The emotional toll on individuals subjected to cancel culture can lead to long-term mental health issues.
Cultural Divides: Cancel culture can exacerbate cultural and political divides. It often pits people against one another and fosters a “cancel or be canceled” mentality, hindering productive dialogue and understanding. The polarization and division fostered by these movements make it more challenging to find common ground and solutions to complex issues.
Career and Financial Ruin: Some individuals have faced severe consequences, including job loss and financial ruin, as a result of cancel culture. The impact on their livelihoods can be devastating.
Overemphasis on Perfection: Cancel culture can create an unrealistic expectation of perfection, where any past mistake, regardless of its severity or context, can lead to severe consequences. This can discourage personal growth and learning from one’s mistakes.
Inhibiting Change: Rather than promoting genuine accountability and personal growth, cancel culture can push individuals into defensive positions, making it less likely that they will engage in meaningful self-reflection and change.
Loss of Nuance: Complex issues and situations are often reduced to simplistic narratives in cancel culture. Reductionist narratives and a lack of nuance can hinder a deeper understanding of complex social issues, along with the underlying problems and challenges.
Distracts from Real & Systemic Issues: Cancel culture can divert attention and energy away from addressing significant societal issues. Instead of focusing on systemic problems, efforts may be concentrated on individual “cancellations.”
Inhibiting Personal Growth: Cancel culture, when punitive rather than constructive, may discourage personal growth, learning from mistakes, forgiveness of Self and other, and rehabilitation.
Social movements are dynamic and multifaceted. While they may have both positive and negative effects, their overall impact depends on how they evolve, adapt, and respond to societal changes. Ongoing dialogue, critical thinking, and a commitment to addressing underlying issues rather than just individual behaviors can help mitigate some of the potential long-term damage.
The Karma Of Cancel Culture
Karma refers to the consequences of one’s actions, which may affect their future experiences or lifetimes. In a broader sense, many spiritual and philosophical traditions emphasize the idea that our actions have consequences, whether in this life or beyond.
When it comes to attempting to “cancel” someone for their perceived lack of wokeness or perfection, it’s essential to consider the spiritual consequences found within extreme and accusatory moral and ethical frameworks:
Intent Matters: In many belief systems, intent is a crucial factor in determining the karmic consequences of an action. If your intent in addressing someone’s behavior is genuinely rooted in a desire for justice, education, and positive change, the karmic repercussions may be different from actions driven by malice or a desire to harm.
Compassion and Empathy: Spiritual growth often involves cultivating qualities like compassion and empathy. If these virtues guide your actions in addressing someone’s behavior, it can lead to positive spiritual growth for both you and the person involved.
Balance and Accountability: Seeking balance in addressing wrongdoing and promoting accountability can align with many spiritual principles. Encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their actions and offering opportunities for personal growth and learning can be seen as constructive from a spiritual perspective.
Avoiding Harm: In many spiritual and ethical traditions, avoiding harm to others is a fundamental principle. If the act of “canceling” someone causes harm that outweighs the intended benefits, it may have negative karmic consequences.
Self-Reflection: Engaging in self-reflection and introspection about your own motives and actions is a valuable part of many spiritual practices. It can help you assess whether your actions are in alignment with your spiritual values.
What About Accountability?
Accountability for harmful actions or beliefs is essential, and individuals should be held responsible for their actions. However, cancel culture, as it is practiced in some instances, can undermine the principles of karma, justice, forgiveness, and growth.
Balancing accountability with compassion and a commitment to educating and reforming individuals and institutions can help address harmful behavior more effectively.
Finally
In the grand tapestry of social discourse, the nuanced threads of accountability and transformation have been overshadowed by the blunt instruments of cancel culture and corporate virtue signaling. This phenomenon, where individuals and entities are ostracized for perceived missteps without a pathway to redemption, has metastasized into a counterproductive force. It has stifled dialogue and growth, promoting a climate of fear over understanding.
Moreover, the specter of corporate non-allyship—where companies leap onto the bandwagon of social causes with shallow, profit-driven motives—only serves to dilute the potency of genuine activism. Such performative allyship betrays the very principles it purports to support, turning solidarity into a commodity and social justice into a marketing strategy. This commercial co-optation and the zealotry of cancel culture have, in tandem, not only skewed the landscape of accountability but have also entrenched the divisions they seek to heal.
Yet, amid this milieu, lies the seed of a more constructive paradigm. The key to awakening from this shallow slumber lies in embracing a more profound understanding of accountability—one that transcends the binary of condemnation and endorsement to foster genuine growth and healing. It requires moving beyond the echo chambers of righteousness, to engage in difficult, empathetic conversations that acknowledge human fallibility and the capacity for change.
Institutions, communities, and individuals must champion initiatives that prioritize restorative justice over punitive measures, emphasizing education, dialogue, and reconciliation over ostracism. By doing so, we can cultivate a culture that values the transformative power of accountability, recognizes the inherent worth and potential for growth in every individual, and appreciates the complex, often messy journey toward social equity.
To the adherents of a superficially woke ideology, the call to action is clear: We must dive deeper. Beyond the surface-level engagements and performative gestures lies the real work of fostering an inclusive, empathetic society. This involves challenging our own prejudices, continuously educating ourselves, and engaging in meaningful actions that contribute to lasting change. It means supporting causes with time and resources, not just hashtags, and advocating for policies and practices that address the root causes of inequality and injustice.
Most importantly, it involves listening—to the voices of those we aim to support, to the stories of those we disagree with, and to the quiet stirrings of our conscience.
By doing so, we can replace shallow wokeness with deep awareness, transform performative allyship into genuine solidarity, and turn the tide toward a more just and compassionate world. Accountability, then, becomes not a weapon of social warfare but a bridge to understanding and unity—a testament to our shared humanity and our collective capacity for growth.
Oh yeah, and buy The Shankara Oracle for cryin’ out loud. It’s AMAZING.
You will love The Shankara Oracle as it will take you deeply within and connect you with your pure, divine Self.
